A clear decision before you change anything.

A real change is at stake — hiring, software, automation, AI, or redesign — and implementing the wrong description would cost more than checking reality first.

The workflow is already obvious, low-risk, and sufficiently verifiable to implement directly.

• The current workflow, in a defensible version
• The relevant sources and evidence
• Conflicts and unknowns, in plain view
• The material decision points
• Responsible people and systems, where known
• Explicit boundaries between human work and automation
• The exceptions that matter
• Accepted-result criteria
• A final verdict
• One bounded next step

You do not need perfect documentation. A recent real case, the materials that moved through it, and a short explanation of the intended result are normally enough to begin. We do not ask for admin access by default.

Fit Check → human fit review → written scope → EUR 490 → evidence → Protocol Map → optional separately scoped implementation.

Implementation is not included. After the Map you can do nothing, do it yourself, hand it to your team or another provider, or ask us for a separate implementation scope.

Delivery timing is set in the written scope.

Evidence can be incomplete or contradictory. Human review exists to take responsibility for material judgement, not to pretend that an automatic score knows more than it does.