Workflow Leak Self-Check
12 questions. 4 minutes. Your result stays local until you choose to submit.
Get a Workflow Leak Risk score, Founder Bottleneck Score and categories worth inspecting first. The free result shows a local signal. The EUR 490 Protocol Map provides evidence-backed findings, priorities and a first justified next step; implementation is scoped separately.
01WORKFLOW CHOSEN02LOCAL SIGNAL03FIRST FOCUS
Question 1 of 1212 questions remaining
Which workflow keeps returning to you or the founder?
When an exception appears, who decides the next move?
How many meetings last week needed the founder to unblock work?
After a client asks for status, where does the answer get assembled?
Where does the decision reason live after the work moves on?
When a task is marked done, what verifies the business result?
If the founder disappears for 5 working days, what breaks first?
How are AI tools or agents used in this workflow?
What is the escalation rule?
What artifact survives the handoff?
What does the founder calendar reveal about this workflow?
What do you want the map to make visible first?
Indicative local result
Workflow leak riskFree layer: directional category signal, not the paid diagnosis.
Delegation DecisionINSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Self-reported evidence
WorkflowNot provided
Evidence confidencePARTIAL
Workflow clarityUNKNOWN
OwnershipUNKNOWN
Approval controlsUNKNOWN
ObservabilityPARTIAL
Rollback readinessNOT VERIFIED
Recommended AI boundaryNO SYSTEM WRITE
Why this state: Self-check evidence only.
Unknowns: permission boundary, rollback path, external evidence.
Next action: Define the accepted result.
The Protocol Map brings together evidence-backed findings, priority and a first justified next step.
Preliminary local result
Calculated in this browser; not yet reviewed by a person.Primary action: send this route for human suitability review. Secondary: see what the Protocol Map includes.